Billy Bunkie The Science Junkie

Theoretical science, existential spirituality, sprinkled with elements of sociology, anthropology, transhumanism, and funk. [The technical explanation of funk is 'having major skill']

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Pre Big Bang

Satellite To Test 4th Dimension

Many such scientists seek to explain what happened in the first seconds after the big bang, but more diffiuclt and important to understand is what caused the Big Bang. What could cause the simultaneous emission of trillions of joules of energy? Do we have evidence of anything occuring before the big bang? For scientists, they seem to ignore the extremely unexplained creation of the universe.

See the theory of infinite smallness and c != c relativity for more depth on the issue.

Time and Gravity

[This post is originally from May 31, 2006. The longer version of this post with additional notes will be brought back up form archive as soon as it is recovered. Hot Science.]

It seems that a large portion of these theories rests on c != c, and the resulting 'unique' time relativity . Since most of us are moving at the same speed, we experience uniform time.

But some things do move at very high or very low speeds, although none 'stop'. All things move at the speed of light, according to the individual's perfecption of time, but their unique vibration level is what determines what else they resonate with.

If you vibrate on a period of 147 trillion miles, about 1 billion light years, you will experience time about 1 billion times slower. This is incalculable to the average human's experience. Our consciousness is tuned for our local time frequency.

However, we are so small that there is no way we could react with or even realize that such atrsonomically sized particles even existed, let alone the objects they create in stable forms. We are very small subatomic particles in their eyes. And what are subatomic particles in your eyes?

note that if the earth were the size of a bowling ball, it would appear to be completely smooth. Is it? Are you?

Gravity. It appears that one unit of energy over one unit of time produces one unit of gravity. If this particle's period doubles, it will likely produce two units of gravity, but the doubling period means that it is moving twice as quickly.

If a particle were excited to the point of doubling its period [basically packing more energy into a wave, thus increasing it's 'mass'] would it produce twice as much gravity? I believe so. Would it be traveling on a wave path faster than light?

If two waves each cover a distance of 186000 mps as the crow flies, but one's period is 1:1 and the other's is 2:1, the higher frequency[2:1] wave is traveling twice as quickly, at 372000mps, along its snaking path. This is simple geometry. The particle traveling 186000mps at [2:1] is traveling at twice the speed of light.

The 2:1 particle/wave has half as much time to produce gravity, but due to double period/mass, produces twice as much gravity per time. This is undetectable from the result, but the internal physics are different, and important.

Experience [time perception] radiates from an event at the speed of light. If you can go faster than the speed of light/experience, even in a circle, and then stop, you will be waiting for the experience to show up where you are again.

The universe is quantum and relies on experience to define events. If you surpass this wave of time/experience/defintion and then experience it again, you can redefine events. Since the time goes out in all directions, you cannot be in all places [defined] to change all experiences, but you can move yourself to a place where that definition is history, and be somewhat unaffected by the theoretical quantum experiences you didn't experience.

Hmm. This means that quantum decisions are fractals moving in every direction, broadcasting universally their results. E=mc^2, where c = your speed + c. Hmm.

your speed + c, and not your speed plus 186000mps. This would only be important in terms of different experiential time speeds, due to existing velocity. This may have a second layer of relative change, allowing a mathematical formula to distinguish the size of the difference between astronomical frequency layers.

c-sub2 = the speed of the experiencer plus c. in a stable location, the speed of light would be the speed of the experiencer, which can be equated to 0 in any space, plus the speed of the rest of the universe below him in scale, which is infinitesmal, but real, and begins with the stable speed of the foundation of his particles, 186000mps. Add to it his own speed. It may be that tinier and tinier and larger and larger universes have geometrically equal upward and downward scaling levels of c, based on the speed of the experiencer, which varies based on scale, and the speed of light, which varies based on the experiencer.

this would mean that in a world where a hydrogen atom is ~1 billion light years wide, and an experiencer's ambient period was 1 billion light years, light would behave as though it moved at 1 billion light years per second.

the speed of light may be relative to the mass/period of the experiencer.

Theory of Infinite Smallness

The Theory of Infinite Smallness was built in 2003 , but it is more articulately and completely described in The 29 May 2006 posting regarding scaling relativity.

Infinite smallness adds points that scaling relativity does not, particularly about matterless existance and magnetic field entrainment.

The components inside a stable atom have individual magnetic charges, yet outside the radius of the atom their individual charges are sublimed into the atom's fundamental charge.

this occurs on an astronomical scale, but has effects that build the functional stability of our world. in the same way, our magnetic fields blend and sublime and entrain to become like one another, form group signature fields with independent individual fields, in physics, sociology, and psychology.

Entrainment says that two similar waves traveling in the same space take energy to remain disctinct from one another. When this energy is exhausted or no longer cycled in, the waves will be at one identical frequency. I believe the level of energy required may be dependent on the fraction of similarity of the two waves.

A stronger wave can be entrained by a smaller wave if the smaller wave has greater energetic backing to keep it stable, despite its lower displayed energy level. If the weaker field is massive in scale it may overpower even strong but brief waves/fields. A wave will behave the same as a field. A wave is a moving field and a field ~is a static wave.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

OBL Not Behind 9/11

The video of Osama bin Laden confessing to the 9/11 attacks, which America used as evidence of his guilt and a pretense to invade Afghanistan, was fake.

Osama bin Laden quickly denied any involvement with 9/11 after it happened. We had nothing to go on, except for the 9/11 media myth.

Then we found a video in a house in Afghanistan apparently containing Osama's confession. If you examine the video, the man's nose and face are differently shaped and he looks like another man than Osama. Osama is left handed. The man writes something in the video with his right hand. He is also wearing a gold ring, which is forbidden in Islam. The man in the video is not Osama. The confession was faked.

9 of the 19 9/11 hijackers are alive and living in the Middle East and elsewhere. They do not appear to be Al-Qaeda operatives.

USA's CIA trained armed and funded Al-Qaeda.

The 9/11 disaster contains evidence of being prearranged, including secondary explosives in both main WTC, and a series of rigged explosives in Building 7, which was detonated without being hit by a plane.

Flight 93 landed safely in Cleveland at 10:45, and did not crash in a field. The Pentagon's damage profile indicates armor piercing attack, lacks wreckage, and has no damage where the airliner's engines would have struck. Only 2 planes were used for attacks on 9/11, and everyone saw them.

Mayor Guiliani restricted Ground Zero from FEMA, but let Controlled Demolition into the site. He also shipped the girders to foreign recycling yards before they could be examined.

That is tampering with evidence of a national attack. That is treason. Mayor Guiliani should be tried for treason.

The 9/11 Commission should be officially reopened by the government, possibly the House or Senate, and numerous independent investigators should be assigned. Furthermore, the ACLU should begin work on this investigation without regard to government support and broadcast their findings to the media.


Free energy. Ethical society. Effortless domination with deservations.

Revisions : 0 | Posted: 5/30/2006 5:15:38 AM | IP: Recorded

There are 2 replies to this message. There are 2 replies on this page.


Total Posts: 6
Last Post: 5/30/2006
Member Since: 5/30/2006

And your sources for all these...interesting...assertions? Please, do tell. Enquiring people want to know!

"Ladies and gentlemen, you are such a wonderful crowd, we'd like to play a little tune for you. It's one of my personal favorites and I'd like to dedicate it to a young man who doesn't think he's seen anything good today - [Gauche], this one's for you."

Is life imitating art or art imitating life? We may never know, but it does promise to be entertaining either way...

"For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?"

Revisions : 0 | Posted: 5/30/2006 8:55:45 PM | IP: Recorded


Total Posts: 1,385
Last Post: 5/30/2006
Member Since: 12/19/2005

Well, I'd love to tell you and I eventually will.

But I'd like you to research the topics yourself so you are exposed to news sources that collect and distribute this kind of information.

I advise you to begin searching at Try several search strings:

'Flight 93 Cleveland'
'OBL confession faked'
'Bush faked news'
'secondary explosion'
'pentagon video'

you may also choose to investigate

You will likely not find these kinds of news from the televised corporate media until they are proven in the internet media, and a sufficient numer of people know about them or inquire about them for the corporate media to decide to spearhead the issue and steer it in a direction of their choosing.


Free energy. Ethical society. Effortless domination with deservations.

Monday, May 29, 2006

Thank You

I would like a paid position corresponding for media outlets of my choosing.


Movie theaters are examples of 'push' media. They show film and you sign up for it. It is broadcast at a certain time. Smaller rooms showing the movie on a digital projection monitor or screen, available for small parties or single-viewing rental would turn the movies into a 'pull' market, where people arrive and request movie viewings.

A digital library could be connected to a central database, and people could request viewing any movie since the dawn of movies from the databse, ad charged a ticket fee. The rush of snackbuying would be spread out, classic film theaters could prosper without substantial license fees, the place could be turned into a movie-restaurant instead of a theater. Parties of any size could have relative privacy, and huge theater audiences could still be provided for very popular choices on a push basis. But if you come late, watch it on the smaller booth. And order some fries.

It'll be fantastic.

Time Travel *IS* For The Differently Energied

Time Travel *IS* For The Differently Energied

when moving at the speed of light, light still appears to be moving 'at the speed of light'. 186,000mps is the slope at which relativity affects size scale. time and size are relative based on the observed speed of light.

we are bogged down in time, at the speed of light. if we were traveling from the sun to the earth at the speed of light, we would perceive light moving at the speed of light away from us still.

your energy frequency period [electrons, electricity] is at the speed of light, in a grouping of perhaps a few nanometers. that is the wave depth of a beam light. when we move at the speed of light, we are behaving like an object whose wave depth is ~186,000miles. that is an enormous object. the period of our energy is moving at the speed of light on a nanometer width, and also we are moving in space at 186,000, functioning as the wave depth of a far larger width stream of energy. the width of this stream of energy [aka the depth of its wave trough/peak] is the conversion kit that translates size into relative time.

we have already achieved stable existance in this size scale. i am standing here moving at 186000 mph by the electricity in my body and the atoms spinning inside me.

atoms spin at the speed of light, eh? and energy travels at the speed of light, eh? an atom is a bundled up series of condensed, [looping] 'light beams' or energy particles fixed in a stable rotation. this bundle of light is a piece of ethereal foundation upon which larger groupings can readily form. the difference between a particle and a wave may be the route of the path of a piece of energy.

it may be that a particle is a looping path like a circular doodle, and a wave is just that, a wave. but 'inside' this wave, there is also energy moving at a period of the speed of light back and forth through the amperage of the wave itself, with the wave's peak and trough being more like turns in a road, and the energy inside the wave being like a driver swerving back and forth on the road at the speed of light. this is the bundling of energy. the driver is taking a longer path than the road is long, so may be going faster than the wave itself. smaller things go faster, or use up less time to move, as relativity shows. inside that driver, too, there is a person moving back and forth in the car, and the person ate a sandwich which is moving back and forth inside his stomach at the speed of light relative to the period of his stomach being '186000'.

if the stomach, or the period is the static figure provided, then the energy moving through it will move at a predictable speed along the period path, with the road it travels being an observed 186000 mps. my stomach is 6" wide. for a piece of energy to bounce inside it back and forth along a pathway, while the stomach travels 186000mps, how fast is the energy moving? 186000mps, times the deviation of the wave from a straight path. if over one euclidian geometric bar, while y = 0, x=0 to x=1, the path of the sandwich covers 2 units of distance, the stomach has moved 186000x2 mps in the same amount of time that it took the stomach to move 186000, at the speed of light. the sandwich is moving faster than the speed of light, and is therefore confined to the stomach, which becomes a seperate function of reality by nature of time. the stomach has aged 2 seconds. the sandwich has aged 1 second. this causes two universes to exist, with 2 seperate time rates occuring, nested inside one another. they are associated with themselves because of their similar speed and therefore time. interacting with another universe would require a massive shift in time, or absolute speed.

as things approach the speed of light, they gain infinite mass. yes, their total wave energy, the energy of their stable atoms added to the energy of their linear velocity increases towards infinity. by the speed of light can never be attained. even when traveling 186000, light appears to be going 186000 more. this changes the value of c, and merely adds geometrically to your energy. e = mc2 may need to account for a variable speed of light relative to your own speed. your energy can always be determined by your speed alone, with the fulcrim being the difference between your size [wave period plus linear speed] and the speed of light, which is unattainable, but static in its relationship to your speed/energy. make c = c + your speed and this will account for the changing observed speed of light.

the sandwich and stomach [or an atom and light] are made of the same thing: the pure energy of creation. which bundles together in larger and larger scaled stable groupings [atoms, universes] differentiated by the period of the speed of light. an association of energy particles made of these foundation groupings, all traveling in unison like a solar system in a galaxy, does not affect us. the fact that earth is moving 19mps is unnoticed because we move with the earth.

so, forget my size. i am made of stable blocks moving internally at the speed of light and obeying their own relative scale and time laws.

we measure a mile by the number of these stable groups that fit in a mile. 5280 feet of them. [it should probably be answered in terms of the average width of a stable hydrogen atom, to a certain power, instead of by meters.] i am currently moving about 19mps faster than these items. my outstanding period is about 19mps. if i increase my speed by 5mps, i am at 24mps total period above stable.

if i move at 186000mps, i am at the speed of light faster than these foundation particles. the speed of light is a hurdle in period stability. perhaps this is because of the ambient radiation of the mass of stable particles at this scale. if i can outshine and outresonate the ambient radiation level arriving from those stable particles [the universal constant?], i will begin to associate as a particle of the next highest stable scale of foundation particles, whose mere energy trough/peak is 180000 miles wide. that would mean that the most simple stable foundation particle of
the particle with a 186000 mile period [peak/trough] would be...

well, if a hydrogen atom can be represented by a pineapple in hawaii and a grain of sand in california, multiply 186000 miles by the numer of grains of sand it would take stacked back to back to reach hawaii from california, and that is the *radius* of the stable foundation particle the next scale-size larger than ourselves.

calculator says... 2500 miles = 5000 mile radius. 26.4 million feet. 1 cm grains of sand would be enormous. 30 in a foot. 792 million grains of sand between la and honolulu. 792 million x 186000 = 147312 billion miles. that is 147 trillion miles long.

it may be so that if i am traveling 30,000mps, i experience [30/186][-1] as much time as something going 0mps.

i am comfortable with these numbers.

time is a measuring stick of size. hmm. that means that if something is moving at 147 trillion miles per second, and i am moving at 0/186000, they are experiencing time almost a billion times slower than i am. and that a long life could happen 100 million times in a second of this giant atom's experience.

i also speculate that astronomically large energetic bodies can be stable and behave according to the molecular theory. that molecular theory governs not only the differece between people-size and atom-size, but between people-size and 147tmps [trillion miles per second] size.

"i am excited! *very* excited... ... particles."

so i suppose the light from the sun already is here, in the future. or if we were moving fast enough it would already be here, instantly. time has nothing to do with waiting. it has to do with what speed you're already moving at.

experience is another critical factor in time. making associations in the brain may increase your experienced speed, as electrical particles move at the speed of light.

does light change speed when turning from a wave into a particle? if its wave period X linear motion does not continually equal 186000, it may be changing it's path speed.

so why don't all these atoms burst apart and become rays of energy? they are affected by one anothers magnetic fields, which occurs according to regular parabolic laws, but with much grander originating values. perhaps smaller objects pack in more magnetic field per 'second' because of relativity. is an astronomically tiny particle a much higher energy particle, to the point that it operates at geometrically higher rates of speed [1 billion x faster per stomch:sandwich], but during geometrically smaller amounts of time? is the energy of a whole universe's billion years expended in an atom in one second?

On Tue, 16 May 2006 09:48:26 -0400,
> norn_iron replied to your post at the site: .
> good post but im a bit confused about this
In reply to:

> Light is actually moving infinitely quickly, and size is merely a way of
> dividing time. When moving at the speed of light, light appears to be
> going at the speed of light.

> if this wher tru then would light from the sun, stars etc not be here
> instantaneously rather than talking time to travel the distance?


this also accounts for the inability to see beyond our own universe, for the existance of other universes, black and white holes being areas of resonation between sandwich:stomach, for matterless existance, and for infinite smallness and stable subatomic functions.

we view the atom like the cell of the 1890's. They had no idea what was inside the cell before the SEM, except the nucleus. there's more junk. in the same way there is the world.

hmm, a matterless existance X consciousness would invariably prove the existance of the soul, of God, of numerous excellent things. let it be.

Sunday, May 28, 2006

We get Signal

Currently we live in a 'push' market of television broadcast. It goes out and everyone who is allowed to receives it. We could have a 'pull' market of media broadcast, like internet, where media is requested and replied.

This push TV is governed by the FCC. Certain wave frequencies are dedicated to certain economic interests. This kind of push market uses up a very high amount of overhead expense and forces companies to rely on advertising, establishing an economic incentive to media. This also allows dedicated careers to media and broadcast production, though.

A request/pull media would also have the ability to interact economically and produce careers, but in a much more democratic way. It would become a cookoff instead of a buffet.

Democracy is a cookoff, not a buffet.

The media i suppose is based on following customers. It must be made so that the media switched from a push to a pull economy. The internet must be demonstrated to provide substantial replacement for forms of push-media.

This is a critical period in the development of media, but regardless of the laws made now the right ones will be in place within decades.

Communication needs to transfer from pull to push, and media needs to transfer from push to pull. Calling someone on the phone should be a broadcast, not a company request. Getting the news should be a request, not a 'flip it on'. This will substantially reduce FCC waste and deadair signal, and free up much communication space for the 1ST AMENDMENT [sp] and reduce the overhead of media, changing its function.

This will look like this:

>100 million Americans get their daily news and information and even entertainment from the internet and not from the TV or radio. is a fine model for this media. Major broadcast companies receive less funding from advertisers from dropping audiences.

Internet servers hosting movies and information increase advertising budgets, outpacing the costs of serverspace. Internet communication rates continue to increase slightly, and the cost of a GB of HD and bandwidth drop dramatically. Movies, reviews, information of all kinds are put online. Centralization of media via decentralization of media.

Media careers become more widespread and lower economic intensity. This puts 'stardom' and civil service within reach of all kinds of individuals on the net and removes some luster from conventional Hollywood celebrity.

Feature length movies in theaters can be made by individuals and media groups and distributed on the internet with webcam and video editing software. The government/FCC provides public funding for internet media service on a page-by-page basis by verified numbers of hits. The web of the internet expands and various netrings for all manner of information are formed. More users worldwide get online and internet use between continents and international reasons and needs increases. The UN provides internet news service and sponsors long lists of information spreading websites on everything from poverty to medical conditions to activism groups.

Net activism replaces 60's style protests.

Television becomes like radio.

Software defined radio replaces cellular phones, and is supported by public service networks instead of telecomm giants. The people and the government[s] work together to bring about these advances while telecommmedia companies gradually disperse their activities into internet and technical service fields.

Monday, May 15, 2006

Wave period, frequency, and justice

Time, Reality, Quantum XP, and Relativity the cosmological constant might be related to the layering of 'time' in scale of the hugeness of reality. yes it'd probably take a hundred billion years for a ball the size of creation to roll down a bowling alley proportionally as long. this is how time is made, though. it is scaled by size. a tiny ball going down a tiny lane as long as an electron would take infinitismally little time. your time is relevant to your size. and your velocity is a measurement of your 'period', or affects it. amazing. this produces time in the x- and y- quadrants that may be entirely independent.

i don't really know how i feel about that. it makes me somewhat uncomfortable and i don't know how to reconcile x- and y- time. i am more comfortable with time being created by the rolling of a ball than on which axis it is spinning.

this can also create the possibility of alternate times/quantum paths of experience, and navigating these 'realities'. this also means that your action and motion affects reality on a fundamental level, regardless of the expression of the action, and principly on the FREQUENCY OF THE ACTION!!!!!!!!

"that is so important i'm making it a new blog."

Time Travel is for suckers

My name is William Bunker. I am from Massachusetts.

The theory of infinite smallness states that there is no largest or smallest particle. furthermore, it states that all things are made of the grouped electromagetic fields of a cluster of 'objects', those objects also being clusters.

A magetic signature of a cluster of objects can be taken from a radius, such as the exterior of an atom. It tells the average or total sum of the magetic properties of that cluster. It tells the magnetic signature at a radius, but not the identity of specific magnetic objects inside that cluster.

This can be compared to a topographical magnetic map of existance, and is an effective way of measuring things at a local size scale.

Infinite size also affects time. Size and time are both relative. A bowling ball 10 billion light years wide would take hundreds of trillions of our local 'years' to roll down an alley of comparable scale.

The regional speed limit is the speed of light. Light is actually moving infinitely quickly, and size is merely a way of dividing time. When moving at the speed of light, light appears to be going at the speed of light.

Just by being, you are moving at the speed of light, but in tiny groupings and vibrations of your molecules and atoms. You are moving at the speed of light, but the period of your movement is miniscule. Therefore, you experience relative time on the size scale that we see.

When moving in one direction at the speed of light, the period of your 'wave' of existance approaches the period of the 'molecules' of the next astronomical 'level' of scale greater in size.

If you move more quickly than the speed of light in one direction, you will break from the predictable path of 'vibration' of the astronomical iteration of an 'atom' [being approximately 10 billion light years wide].

By moving faster in one direction than the period of the wave of your scale, you will resonate with the higher wave. This would be like an electron breaking the pull of an atom!! I see it!! It is the multiple dimensions of the universe! This is scale translating into depth!! Amazing!!!


01:32:29) H: i create meaning, but i do not often create content. God creates most content and ithink i merely interpret it
(01:32:29) s: What?
(01:32:52) H: love is the answer
(01:32:54) s: Ok, now I'm lost.
(01:33:00) s: Oh, THAT I get.

(01:33:13) s: Love is the Highest Power, and in the end it always wins.